speeddownloadcampaign.blogg.se - Avast suspicious item detected

Resources required to download the necessary files this often can When actively running in the background whileĬonnected to the Internet, each anti-virus may try to update theirĭefinition databases at the same time. System instability, catastrophic crashes, slow performance and waste Thus, using multipleĪnti-virus solutions can result in kernel mode conflicts causing Install kernel mode drivers that load at boot-up regardless of whether Insert themselves deep into the operating systems core where they Them is disabled for use as a stand-alone on demand scanner, it canĪffect the other and cause conflicts. Running in real-time protection mode simultaneously. Primary concern with doing so is due to Windows resource managementĪnd significant conflicts that can arise especially when they are Using more than one anti-virus program is not advisable. Instead of running multiple AVs you can supplement your favorite ONE with Anti-Malware tools like Malwarebytes antimalware or Hitman Pro and observe safe internet usage practices.Īlso, when uninstalling any, be sure to use the removal tool provided by vendor. Running multiple AV's on the machine can have effects like low performance, instead of increasing security, it decreases the security level, more false positives etc. You should uninstall any of the two as soon as possible. One will suspect the other one's activities as malicious.Īvast is trying to scan your router/default gateway and Norton flags it as malicious here. This is probably an issue with the co-existance' of multiple realtime AV software. To stop being notified for this type of traffic, in the The attack was resulted from \DEVICE\HARDDISKVOLUME4\PROGRAM FILES\AVAST Network traffic from 10.100.100.1/cgi-bin/a2/out.cgi matches the signature ofĪ known attack. It is brief, and in Arabic, I guess.Īctivity: An intrusion attempt by OFFICE2 was blocked.

I have found only one link with a similar case.

The point in question here is beyond the convenience or not of having both active.

My intention is to let go Norton when the trial period expires, but for the time being, both are active.

OFFICE2 is the name of my computer (unless some device replicated it). It is confusing about who were the attacker and attacked. It mentions 4 items involving 2 different IPs. It was not operative since I do not have the drivers installed yet, but perhaps it was involved in the attack.

I had plugged an external long range Wi-Fi adapter for the first time in my PC.

Norton "blamed" Avast, in my own computer, for the attempt. I received a warning from Norton about a OS Attack: GNU Bash CVE-2014-6271 intrusion attempt. I have a Toshiba notebook, which came with Norton Internet Security.